The observed decreases in population of both S. mutans and S. san

The observed decreases in population of both S. mutans and S. sanguinis when they were cultivated together (Figure 2), as compared to the respective mono-species biofilms, could be at least in part attributed to competition for binding sites. Both S. sanguinis

and S. oralis grew well in BMGS broth, with a doubling time of 86.5 (± 2.7) and 80 (± 6.1) minutes, respectively, whereas S. mutans took 134.7 (± 11.6) minutes to double its optical density. These results suggest that S. sanguinis and S. oralis should possess advantages over S. mutans for available nutrients when grown in a mixed-species consortium. Disadvantages in nutrient competition could certainly affect the capacity of S. mutans to accumulate on the glass surfaces, learn more contributing to the observed decreases in biofilm formation when grown together with S. sanguinis or S. oralis selleck products (Figure 2). S. sanguinis is also known to produce hydrogen peroxide, which can inhibit the growth of S. mutans [4, 32], although such an impact on S. mutans growth

was shown to be limited when the organisms were inoculated simultaneously [32], as they were in this study. L. casei did not grow well in BMGS broth, yielding an average of 4.7 × 107 CFU ml-1 after 24 hours, as compared to 6.0 × 108 CFU ml-1 for S. Selleckchem SIS3 mutans. Poor growth could certainly contribute to poor biofilm formation by this bacterium. As was observed with dual-species biofilms, however, co-cultivation of L. casei and S. mutans planktonically Montelukast Sodium in BMGS broth also increased S. mutans CFU by more than 3-fold, with an average CFU of 2.3 × 109 ml-1, although the numbers of L. casei remained similar to those in mono-species cultures (data not shown). The mixed-species broth cultures also had a slightly decreased doubling time (121.4 ± 8.8 minutes), as compared to S. mutans (134.7 ± 11.8 minutes) and L. casei (240 ± 24 minutes) in mono-species planktonic cultures. BHI, and especially MRS, yielded much better growth of L. casei than BMGS, although no major differences were observed

in biofilm formation by L. casei when grown in BHI or MRS (data not shown). Oral lactobacilli, such as L. casei, are a group of acid tolerant bacteria that are commonly isolated in relatively significant proportions from cariogenic dental plaque [33–36]. However, the ability of lactobacilli to adhere to the tooth surface was known to be poor [36]. Results presented here also suggest that L. casei alone does not form biofilms on glass surfaces very effectively, but biofilm formation by this bacterium can be dramatically improved when mixed with S. mutans. S. mutans produces at least three Gtf enzymes [7] that produce high molecular weight glucans that promote bacterial adhesion and biofilm accumulation. Recent studies have shown that these enzymes, especially GtfB, are capable of directly binding to L. casei and other oral bacteria [37].

Comments are closed.